![]() It’s true that, these days, every minimally conscientious citizen needs to pay some attention to the software they run, both for ethical reasons and to protect themselves from the surveillance state (and surveillance capitalism), to the extent this is possible. One should never follow technology down a rabbit hole, and I did precisely that. What’s more, I spent far too much time trying. NET system requirements and I have not found a way to get the program running again on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. For whatever reason, the developers upped the. I continued to so until quite recently-the Windows beta ran fine under Wine until late last year (Beta 30, I believe). When I reviewed Scrivener 3 a couple of years ago, I was running it on both macOS and Linux (via Wine). And this question was prompted by a recent experience I had with Scrivener itself, which remains the most popular (and capable) program of its kind. The more relevant question today, then, is how can writers make sure today’s technology works for them, rather than the other way ’round. Michael Chabon, on the other hand, has credited Scrivener (along with iA Writer, DEVONthink, Nisus Writer and numerous Apple products) in the creation of his work. For her, that was obviously the right choice. Kwon, whose debut novel The Incendiaries received very strong reviews, told me she investigated Scrivener but found its complexities too distracting and decided to stick with Word. Is Word alone enough? For some writers, yes. Most writers have acknowledged the usefulness of Scrivener and its competitors, even if they stick with Word or (in some cases) don’t use a computer to write at all. ![]() But I don’t believe it remains particularly relevant. This piece in The Atlantic by Scrivener creator Keith Blount, from 2011, sums that stigma up nicely.Įven today, in the third decade of this troubling new century, the question is not entirely resolved. When specialized software for “creative writing” first began to appear a decade or so back, there was a definite stigma attached to such software by professional writers. ![]() The questions above have been making the rounds for a while now. ĭo writers actually need specialized “writing software” such as Scrivener? Or is the publishing industry’s standard word processor, Microsoft Word, sufficient unto itself? You’ll want the AppImage version, available here. Scrivener 3 on Mac or Windows can export to the version 2 format, which the Linux beta version can read, so you can go back and forth between platforms. Update, : it should be noted that the abandoned Scrivener Linux beta, version 1.9.0.1 with no expiration date, is still a valid option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |